사용자:Shyoon1/작업장8

청나라(1616년 ~ 1912년)은 중국의 마지막 봉건 황조이다. ‘청’(淸)이란 국호는 1636년 아직 만주 일대만을 지배하고 있을 때 정해졌고, 1644년 명나라가 멸망한 이후 중원을 손에 넣었다. 청나라는 270여년간 중국 대륙을 지배하다가 1912년, 아이신기오로 씨 황실이 우창 봉기를 기화로 발발한 신해혁명으로 세워진 중화민국에게 모든 권한을 넘기며 황조의 문을 닫았다.

누르하치(1559년 ~ 1626년)는 명나라 말기, 분열되어 있던 여진족을 통일하고 1616년, 여진족이 세웠던 금나라의 뜻을 잇는다는 명분으로 후금을 세우고 의 자리에 올랐다. 그의 여덟 번째 아들이자 뒤를 이은 홍타이지(1592년 ~ 1643년)는 1636년, 여진족을 만주족으로 바꾸어 부르도록 하고 국호 역시 ‘금’에서 ‘청’으로 바꾸었다. 한에만 머물렀던 누르하치와는 달리, 홍타이지는 청나라 황실을 세운 실질적인 창건자로서 황제라는 중국의 최고 통치자를 일컫는 칭호를 처음으로 사용하기도 했다. 또한 그는 중국의 풍습을 본받아 수도인 묵던태묘를 짓고 조상들의 신위를 봉안하였다. 1644년 북경을 점령한 청나라는 기존 명나라의 태묘를 새로 단장하고, 1648년(순치 5년)에 누르하치에게 황조의 창건자에게 주로 올리는 묘호인 태조로 추숭하였다.

이전 황조인 명나라의 황제들과 같이, 청나라의 황제들은 재위 기간 내내 한 개의 연호만을 사용하였는데 이는 한나라, 당나라의 황제들이 여러 개의 연호를 번갈아 썼던 것과는 달랐다. 또한 재위 기간 동안 그 연호 하나만 썼기 때문에 현대에 들어와서도 연호 강희를 썼던 청나라의 제4대 황제 성조는 강희제로 더 널리 알려져있다. 청나라에는 12명의 황제가 있었는데 이 중 제3대 황제 순치제(재위: 1643년 ~ 1661년)가 중원을 통치한 최초의 청 황제였다. 그의 아들이자 4대 황제 강희제(재위: 1661년 ~ 1722년)는 재위기간이 61년에 달하여 중국 역사상 가장 오랫동안 옥좌에 앉아있던 황제였다. 그러나 제6대 황제인 건륭제(재위: 1735년 ~ 1795년)는 재위기간이 60년으로 조부인 강희제를 초월하여 재위하기를 거부하여, 1796년(가경 원년), 아들인 가경제에게 양위하고 태상황제로서 4년 동안 모든 권력을 장악했다. 이 때문에 그가 양위하지 않았다면, 강희제를 넘기고 가장 오랫동안 재위한 중국의 군주가 될 수 있었다. 청나라의 황제들은 대대로 아버지에서부터 아들로 승계되어 왔으나 1874년, 후사를 남기지 못하고 죽은 동치제(재위: 1861년 ~ 1874년)부터는 당시 황실의 실력자 서태후가 지목하여 황제에 앉혔는데 이렇게 황제가 된 사람이 바로 제11대 황제 광서제이자 마지막 황제 선통제이다.

Succession 편집

 
"Spring's Peaceful Message", by Giuseppe Castiglione, represents the passing of the throne from the Yongzheng emperor (left) to his son Hongli (right), the future Qianlong emperor. Hongli was the first Qing monarch to be chosen through the secret system that his father instated to prevent struggles over succession.[1]

Unlike the Ming emperors, who named their eldest legitimate son heir apparent whenever possible and forbade other sons from participating in politics, the Qing monarchs did not choose their successors according to primogeniture.[2] When in 1622 Nurhaci (1559–1626) was asked which one of his sons he had chosen to succeed him as khan of the Jurchens, he refused to answer, telling his sons that they should determine after his death who among them was the most qualified leader.[2] His answer reflected the fact that in Jurchen society, succession as tribal chieftain was usually determined by merit, not descent.[2] When Nurhaci died in 1626, a committee of Manchu princes selected Hong Taiji (1592–1643) as his successor.[3] Hong Taiji's death in 1643 caused another succession crisis, because many of Nurhaci's other sons appeared to be qualified leaders. As a compromise, the Manchu princes chose Hong Taiji's four-year-old son Fulin (the Shunzhi Emperor, r. 1643–1661) as his successor, marking the adoption of father-son succession in the Qing imperial line.[4]

Shunzhi, who died of smallpox in 1661, chose his third son Xuanye as successor because he had survived smallpox.[5] That child reigned as the Kangxi Emperor (r. 1661–1722), who for the first time in Qing history followed the Chinese habit of primogeniture and appointed his eldest son Yinreng (1674–1725) as heir apparent.[6] The heir apparent was removed twice because of his extravagance and abhorrent behavior, which included an attempt to assassinate the emperor.[7] After Yinreng was demoted for good in 1712, the emperor refused to name an heir.[8] Because Qing policy forced imperial princes to reside in the capital Beijing, many princes became involved in politics, and the Kangxi succession became particularly contested.[9] After Kangxi's death in 1722, his fourth son Yinzhen (1678–1735) emerged as victor and reigned as the Yongzheng Emperor, but his legitimacy was questioned for years after his accession.[10]

To avoid such struggles in the future, Yongzheng designed a system by which the living emperor would choose his successor in advance and on merit, but would keep his choice secret until his deathbed.[9] The name of the future emperor was sealed in a casket that was hidden behind a panel in the rafters of the Qianqing palace inside the Forbidden City.[9] As successor, Yongzheng chose his fifth son Hongli (1711–1799), who himself selected his fifteenth son Yongyan. The latter, who reigned as the Jiaqing emperor (r. 1796–1820), chose his successor Minning (1782–1850) in 1799, but only read his testament shortly before dying.[11]

When Zaichun, the Tongzhi Emperor, died heirless in 1874, his mother Empress Dowager Cixi was the one who selected the next emperor. But instead of making the deceased emperor adopt an heir from the generation below himself (in this case this would have been a nephew of the Tongzhi Emperor) as the rules of imperial succession dictated, she picked one from the same generation.[12] The new emperor was Zaitian (1871–1908), son of one of the half-brothers of Cixi's late husband the Xianfeng emperor (r. 1850–1861).[11] She assured opponents that as soon as the new emperor had a son, he would be adopted into Zaichun's line.[12] But Zaichun died heirless too, and Cixi also chose his successor Puyi in 1908.[11]

Regents and empresses dowager 편집

Qing succession and inheritance policies made it difficult for empresses and their relatives to build power at court, as they had in the Han dynasty for example.[13] Threats to imperial power usually came from within the imperial clan.[14] When the young Fulin was chosen to succeed his father Hong Taiji in September 1643, two "prince regents" were selected for him: Hong Taiji's half-brother Dorgon (1612–1650) and Nurhaci's nephew Jirgalang (1599–1655). Soon after the Qing had seized Beijing under Dorgon's leadership in May 1644, Dorgon came to control all important government matters.[15] Official documents referred to him as "Imperial Uncle Prince Regent" (Huang shufu shezheng wang 皇叔父攝政王), a title that left him one step short of claiming the throne for himself.[16] A few days after his death, he received a temple name (Chengzong 成宗) and a honorific posthumous title (Yi huangdi 義皇帝, "Righteous Emperor"), and his spirit tablet was placed in the Imperial Ancestral Temple next to those of Nurhaci and Hong Taiji.[17] In early March 1651 after Dorgon's supporters had been purged from the court, these titles were abrogated.[18]

The three most powerful regents of the Qing dynasty: (from left to right) Dorgon (r. 1643–1650), Oboi (r. 1661–1669), and Empress Dowager Cixi (r. 1861–1889 and 1898–1908)

The reign of the Shunzhi emperor ended when he died of smallpox in 1661 at the age of 22.[19] His last will—which was tampered and perhaps even forged by its beneficiaries—appointed four co-regents for his son and successor the six-year-old Xuanye, who was to reign as the Kangxi Emperor.[20] All four were Manchu dignitaries who had supported Shunzhi after the death of Dorgon, but their Manchu nativist measures reversed many of Shunzhi's own policies.[21] The "Oboi regency", named after the most powerful of the four regents, lasted until 1669, when Kangxi started his personal rule.[22]

For almost 200 years, the Qing empire was governed by adult emperors. In the last fifty years of the dynasty—from the death of the Xianfeng Emperor in 1861 to the final abdication of the child emperor Puyi in 1912—the imperial position again became vulnerable to the power of regents, empress dowagers, imperial uncles, and eunuchs.[23] Empress Dowager Cixi (1835–1908), wife of the late Xianfeng emperor, came to power through a coup that ousted eight regents who had been named by her husband. She controlled the government during the Tongzhi (1861–1875) and Guangxu (1875–1908) reigns. From 1861 on, she was officially co-regent, but her political role increased so much that within a few years she was taking charge of most government matters. She became sole regent in 1881 after the death of the other empress dowager.[12] With the assistance of eunuchs and Manchu princes, she remained regent until March 1889, when she finally let the Guangxu Emperor rule personally (he was then 28 years old).[24] After she intervened to end the Hundred Days' Reform in September 1898, she had the emperor put under house arrest and held the reins of Qing government until her death in 1908.[25] She was the one who chose Guangxu's successor the child Puyi, whose regent was his father Zaifeng, Prince Chun.

Multiple appellations 편집

Like the emperors of previous dynasties, Qing monarchs were known by several names, which were to be used in different circumstances.

Era name 편집

 
The young Zaichun ruled as the Tongzhi Emperor from 1862 until his death in 1875. The era name Tongzhi, an allusion to the Book of Documents, was chosen to reflect the new political situation after his mother Empress Dowager Cixi (1835–1908) ousted Zaichun's eight regents in a coup in November 1861.

An emperor's era name was chosen at the beginning of his reign to reflect the political concerns of the court at the time.[26] A new era name became effective on the first day of the New Year after that emperor's accession, which fell sometime between 21 January and 20 February (inclusively) of the Gregorian calendar.[27] Even if an emperor died in the middle of the year, his era name was used for the rest of that year before the next era officially began.[28] Because of this discrepancy between the first day of an era and the day of an emperor's accession, most emperors first reigned under their predecessor's era name.

Like the emperors of the Ming dynasty, Qing monarchs used only one reign era name and are usually known by that name, as when we speak of the "Qianlong emperor" (r. 1735–1795) or the "Guangxu emperor" (r. 1875–1908).[29] Strictly speaking, referring to the Qianlong emperor simply as "Qianlong" is wrong, because "Qianlong" was not that emperor's own name but that of his reign era. For convenience sake, however, many historians still choose to call him Qianlong (though not "emperor Qianlong").[30] The only Qing emperors who are not commonly known by their reign name are the first two: Nurhaci (r. 1616–1626), who is known by his personal name, and his son and successor Hong Taiji (r. 1626–1643), whose name was in fact a title meaning "prince Hong". Hong Taiji was also the only Qing emperor to use two era names (see table).[31]

Reign names are usually left untranslated, but some scholars occasionally gloss them when they think these names have a special significance. Historian Pamela Crossley explains that Hong Taiji's first era name Tiancong 天聰 (abkai sure in Manchu) referred to a "capacity to transform" supported by Heaven, and that his second one Chongde 崇德 (wesihun erdemungge) meant the achievement of this transformation.[31] The practice of translating reign names is not new: Jesuits who resided at the Qing court in Beijing in the eighteenth century translated "Yongzheng"—or its Manchu version "Hūwaliyasun tob"—as Concordia Recta.[32]

An era name was used to record dates, usually in the format "Reign-name Xth year, Yth month, Zth day" (sometimes abridged as X/Y/Z by modern scholars). Qing era names were also used on the coins that were cast in each reign.[33] Unlike in the Ming dynasty, the characters used in the era names of Qing emperors were taboo, that is, the characters contained in it could no longer be used in writing throughout the empire.[34]

Personal name 편집

As in previous dynasties, the emperor's personal name became taboo after his accession.[35] The use of xuan 玄 ("mysterious", "profound") in the Kangxi Emperor's personal name Xuanye 玄燁, for example, forced printers of Buddhist and Daoist books to replace this very common character with yuan 元 in all their books.[36] Even the Daodejing, a Daoist classic, and the Thousand Character Classic, a widely used primer, had to be reprinted with yuan instead of xuan.[36]

When the Yongzheng emperor, whose generation was the first in which all imperial sons shared a generational character as in Chinese clans, acceded the throne, he made all his brothers change the first character of their name from "Yin" 胤 to "Yun" 允 to avoid the taboo.[37] Citing fraternal solidarity, his successor the Qianlong emperor simply removed one stroke from his own name and let his brothers keep their own.[38]

Later emperors found other ways to diminish the inconvenience of naming taboos. The Jiaqing Emperor (r. 1796–1820), whose personal name was Yongyan 永琰, replaced the very common first character of his personal name (yong 永, meaning "forever") with an obscure one (顒) that was also pronounced "yong".[37] The Daoguang emperor (r. 1820–1850) removed the character for "cotton" from his name and decreed that his descendants should henceforth all omit one stroke from their name.[39]

In accordance with Manchu practice, Qing emperors rarely used their clan name Aisin Gioro.[40]

Posthumous titles 편집

Temple name 편집

 
Qing emperors worshiped their ancestors' spirit tablets in the Imperial Ancestral Temple.

After their death, emperors were given a temple name and a honorific name under which they would be worshiped at the Imperial Ancestral Temple. On the spirit tablets that were displayed there, the temple name was followed by the honorific name, as in "Shizu Zhang huangdi" for the Shunzhi Emperor and "Taizong Wen huangdi" for Hong Taiji. As dynastic founder, Nurhaci ("Taizu") became the focal ancestor in the main hall of the temple.[41] The earlier paternal ancestors of the Qing imperial line were worshiped in a back hall.[41] Historical records like the Veritable Records (중국어 간체자: 实录, 정체자: 實錄, 병음: Shílù), which were compiled at the end of each reign, retrospectively referred to emperors by their temple names.

Hong Taiji created the Qing ancestral cult in 1636 when he assumed the title of emperor.[42] Taking the Chinese imperial cult as a model, he named his main paternal ancestors "kings" and built an Imperial Ancestral Temple in his capital Mukden to offer sacrifices to them.[42] When the Qing took control of Beijing in 1644, Prince Regent Dorgon had the Aisin Gioro ancestral tablets installed in what had been the Ming ancestral temple.[41] In 1648 the Qing government bestowed the title of "emperor" to these ancestors and gave them the honorific posthumous names and temple names by which they were known for the rest of the dynasty.[42] Nurhaci was identified retrospectively as Taizu ("grand progenitor"), the usual name given to a dynasty's first emperor.[43] This is why Nurhaci is considered as the first Qing ruler even if he was never emperor in his lifetime. Taizong was the usual name for the second emperor of a dynasty, and so Hong Taiji was canonized as Qing Taizong.[44]

The last emperor of a dynasty usually did not receive a temple name because his descendants were no longer in power when he died, and thus could not perpetuate the ancestral cult.[45] Puyi, the last Qing monarch, reigned as the Xuantong emperor from 1908 to 1912, but did not receive a temple name.[46]

Honorific posthumous name 편집

After death emperors were given an honorific posthumous title that reflected their ruling style. Nurhaci's posthumous name was originally the "Martial Emperor" (武黃帝 wǔ huángdì)—to reflect his military exploits—but in 1662 it was changed to "Highest Emperor" (高皇帝 gāo huángdì), that is, "the emperor from whom all others descend."[47] Hongtaiji's posthumous name, the "Emperor of Letters" (M.: šu hūwangdi; Ch.: 文皇帝 wén huángdì), was chosen to reflect the way in which he metamorphosed Qing institutions during his reign.[31]

List of emperors 편집

This is a complete list of the emperors of the Qing dynasty. These emperors were usually enthroned on an auspicious day soon after the death of the previous monarch. With two exceptions (Jiaqing and Guangxu), they reigned under their predecessor's era name until the following New Year.[48] The date that appears under "Dates of reign" indicates the first day of the lunisolar year following the death of the previous emperor, which is when the new emperor's era name came into use. The number of years indicated in the same column is the number of years in which that era name was used. Because of discrepancies between the western and the Chinese calendar, this number does not perfectly correspond to the number of years in which an emperor was on the throne.

Since posthumous titles and temple names were often shared by emperors of different dynasties, to avoid confusion they are usually preceded by the dynastic name. The Qianlong emperor, for instance, should be referred to as Qing Gaozong rather than just Gaozong. The table, however, omits the term "Qing", because it is understood that all the emperors listed were from that dynasty. Because each emperor's posthumous name was extremely long—that of the Shunzhi Emperor, for instance, was "Titian longyun dingtong jianji yingrui qinwen xianwu dade honggong zhiren chunxiao Zhang huangdi" 體天隆運定統建極英睿欽文顯武大德弘功至仁純孝章皇帝—the table only shows the short form.[49]

  1. Rawski 1998, 54 (analysis of the painting) and 102 ("secret succession")쪽.
  2. Rawski 1998, 98쪽.
  3. Roth Li 2002, 51–2쪽.
  4. Rawski 1998, 98–99쪽.
  5. Spence 2002, 125쪽.
  6. Wu 1979, 31쪽.
  7. Wu 1979, 118–20 and 154–5쪽.
  8. Rawski 1998, 101–2쪽.
  9. Rawski 1998, 102쪽.
  10. Zelin 2002, 185–86쪽.
  11. Rawski 1998, 103쪽.
  12. Fang 1943b, 297쪽.
  13. de Crespigny 2007, pp. 1217–18 (role of empresses and their clans in the Han dynasty); Naquin 2000, p. 346 (rest of the information).
  14. Rawski 1998, 96–103쪽.
  15. Roth Li 2002, 71쪽.
  16. Wakeman 1985, 861쪽.
  17. Fang 1943a, p. 217 (Chengzong and Yi huangdi); Oxnam 1975, pp. 47–48 (imperial funeral, "Righteous Emperor").
  18. Oxnam 1975, 75쪽.
  19. Dennerline 2002, 118쪽.
  20. Historians widely agree that the Shunzhi will was either deeply modified or forged altogether. See for instance Oxnam 1975, pp. 62–63 and 205-7; Kessler 1976, 20쪽; Wakeman 1985, 1015쪽; Dennerline 2002, 119쪽; and Spence 2002, 126쪽.
  21. Oxnam 1975, 48쪽.
  22. Spence 2002, 133쪽.
  23. Naquin 2000, 346쪽.
  24. Fang 1943b, 298쪽.
  25. Fang 1943b, 298–99쪽.
  26. Wilkinson 2012, 515쪽.
  27. Wilkinson 2012, 512쪽.
  28. Wilkinson 2012, 513–14쪽.
  29. Wilkinson 2012, 182 and 512쪽.
  30. Elliott 2001, p. xii ["Strictly speaking it is proper to refer to him as 'the Qianlong emperor,' since 'Qianlong' was the name assigned to his reign, not his given name. However, for simplicity's sake, I will use the shorter 'Qianlong' in this book."]; Peterson 2002, p. xxi ["The names of the reigns (K'ang-hsi [Kangxi], Ch'ien-lung [Qianlong]) of emperors are routinely treated as if they were the names of the emperors themselves. There are several good reasons for this practice, even though it is historiographically erroneous. We adopt it here as a convention that needs no apology."].
  31. Crossley 1999, 137쪽.
  32. Marinescu 2008, 152쪽.
  33. Wilkinson 2012, 514쪽.
  34. Wilkinson 2012, 276쪽.
  35. Wilkinson 2000, 110쪽.
  36. Wilkinson 2012, 274쪽.
  37. Rawski 1998, 110쪽.
  38. Rawski 1998, 110–11쪽.
  39. Rawski 1998, 111쪽.
  40. Wilkinson 2012, 146쪽.
  41. Rawski 1998, 208쪽.
  42. Rawski 1998, 74쪽.
  43. Wilkinson 2012, 270 ("Taizu" as name of dynastic founder) and 806 (Nurhaci's temple name)쪽.
  44. Wilkinson 2012, 270 (Taizong as name of the second emperor) and 806 (Hong Taiji's temple name)쪽.
  45. Wilkinson 2012, 270쪽.
  46. Wilkinson 2012, 807쪽.
  47. Crossley 1999, 138쪽.
  48. Wilkinson 2012, 806쪽.
  49. This posthumous title appears in Draft History of Qing (Qingshi Gao), chapter 5, p. 163 of the Zhonghua shuju edition.