위키백과

사용자:Turror/연습장2

위키백과의 Turror에 대해서는 위키백과:Turror 문서를 참조하십시오.

위키프로젝트(영어: WikiProject, 영어: Wikiproject)는 특정한 편집 목표를 달성하기 위해, 또 특정한 지식 분야와 관련된 목표를 달성하기 위한 위키의 참여자 단체 조직이다.[1][2][3] 위키프로젝트는 가장 큰 규모의 위키인 위키백과에서 일반화되어 있으며 위키사전, 위키인용집, 위키문헌 등의 자매 프로젝트에서도 어느 정도 존재한다. 또 다른 언어판에도 존재하며 문서를 번역하는 것은 그들이 협업하는 형태의 일종이다. 오픈스트리트맵과 같이 관련 없는 위키 또한 같은 용어를 사용했다.[4] 코로나19 범유행 기간 동안 CBS 뉴스는 질병과 관련된 문서의 정확성을 유지하는 데 있어서 위키백과의 위키프로젝트 의학의 역할에 주목했다.[5] 이 말고도 주목받은 위키프로젝트는 위키프로젝트 여성과학자가 있다. 이는 여성과학자에 대한 문서의 양과 질을 향상시키기 위한 노력의 일환으로 스미소니언 매거진에 의해 프로파일링되었는데, 이 프로파일에서 "위키프로젝트 여성과학자가 위키백과에 등재된 여성과학자 수를 약 1,600명에서 5,000명 이상으로 늘렸다."라고 언급했다.[6]

위키백과에서 편집

Some Wikipedia WikiProjects are substantial enough to engage in cooperative activities with outside organizations relevant to the field at issue. For example, in 2014 the Cochrane Collaboration announced that it had entered into a partnership with Wikipedia's WikiProject Medicine, "to support sharing relevant Cochrane Evidence in Wikipedia’s health articles and to develop strategies to keep Wikipedia’s health-related content up to date, unbiased, and of high quality."[7]

Wikipedia has thousands of WikiProjects, primarily divided between specific topical areas and performing specific maintenance tasks.[1][3] One task commonly performed by topical WikiProjects in Wikipedia is the assessment of the quality of articles that fall within that topic area.[8] In Wikipedia and sister projects, WikiProject pages are located in project space,[1] and the meta information regarding the association between the article and the WikiProject is usually included on the talk page of the article.[8] WikiProjects provide an additional avenue for engagement between editors with similar interests, and have thereby been found to increase the productivity of such editors.[2] In order to spur participation and concentrate effectiveness, WikiProjects in Wikipedia may engage in activities like having a "collaboration of the week",[9] or designating one article to be improved to the point of achieving "featured" status.[10] The WikiProject Council is a group of editors that assists with the development of active WikiProjects, and acts as a central point for inter-WikiProject discussion and collaboration.

A 2008 academic study of Wikipedia concluded that participation in WikiProjects substantially improved the chances of an editor becoming an administrator, finding that one Wikipedia policy edit or WikiProject edit is worth ten article edits,[11] and concluding:

Merely performing a lot of production work is insufficient for "promotion" in Wikipedia. Candidates’ article edits were weak predictors of success. They also have to demonstrate more managerial behavior. Diverse experience and contributions to the development of policies and WikiProjects were stronger predictors of RfA success. This is consistent with the findings that Wikipedia is a bureaucracy[12] and that coordination work has increased substantially.[13][14] [...] Participation in Wikipedia policy and WikiProjects was not predictive of adminship prior to 2006, suggesting the community as a whole is beginning to prioritize policymaking and organization experience over simple article-level coordination.

위키프로젝트와 문서의 질 및 중요도 평가 편집

For related Wikipedia administration pages see Wikipedia:Content assessment.

The English Wikipedia currently has over 2,000 WikiProjects, with varying degrees of activity.[15][16]

In 2007 the English Wikipedia introduced an assessment scale of the quality of articles.[17] Articles are rated by WikiProjects. The range of quality classes begins with "Stub" (very short pages), followed by "Start", "C" and "B" (in increasing order of quality). Community peer review is needed for the article to enter one of the highest quality classes: either "A", "good article" or the highest, "featured article". Of the about 4.4 million articles and lists assessed as of March 2015, about 7000 (0.16%) are a featured article or a featured list. One featured article per day, as selected by editors, appears on the main page of Wikipedia.[18][19]

The articles can also be rated for importance by WikiProjects. Currently,[언제?] there are 5 importance categories: "low", "mid", "high", "top", and "???" for unclassified/unsure level. For a particular article, different WikiProjects may assign different importance levels.

The Wikipedia Version 1.0 Editorial Team has developed a table (shown below) that displays data of all rated articles by quality and importance, on the English Wikipedia. If an article or list receives different ratings by two or more WikiProjects, then the highest rating is used in the table and bar-chart.

Researcher Giacomo Poderi found that articles tend to reach featured status via the intensive work of a few editors.[20] A 2010 study found unevenness in quality among featured articles and concluded that the community process is ineffective in assessing the quality of articles.[21]

사용자:WP 1.0 bot/Tables/OverallArticles 스크립트 오류: 함수 "bar chart"가 존재하지 않습니다.

[Note: The table above (prepared by the Wikipedia Version 1.0 Editorial Team) is automatically updated daily by User:WP 1.0 bot, but the bar-chart is not auto-updated.]

WikiProject Medicine during the COVID-19 pandemic 편집

CBS News described the role of Wikipedia's WikiProject Medicine in making Wikipedia a source of medical information relating to the COVID-19 pandemic, noting that a project member "edits and reviews all the medical content on Wikipedia", but also providing the caveat that "even though medical pages are strictly monitored by the WikiProject team, and hot topics that get a lot of page views are carefully edited, inaccurate information persists on some of Wikipedia's less-read pages".[5]

References 편집

  1. ↑ 가 나 다 Phoebe Ayers, Charles Matthews, Ben Yates, How Wikipedia Works: And how You Can be a Part of it (2008), p. 213.
  2. ↑ 가 나 Robert E. Kraut, Paul Resnick, Sara Kiesler, Building Successful Online Communities (2012), p. 207, "WikiProjects are groups of editors who work together on articles within a domain, like military history, sports, or medicine".
  3. ↑ 가 나 Broughton, John (2008). 《Wikipedia – The Missing Manual》. O'Reilly Media. 165–175쪽.  인용 오류: 잘못된 <ref> 태그; "Broughton"이 다른 콘텐츠로 여러 번 정의되었습니다
  4. ↑ “Mapping projects”. 《OpenStreetMap》. 2020년 5월 26일에 확인함. 
  5. ↑ 가 나 Laudato, Anthony (2020년 5월 24일). “The rise of Wikipedia as a source of medical information”. CBS News. 
  6. ↑ Daley, Jason (2016년 3월 15일). “How a College Student Led the WikiProject Women Scientists”. Smithsonian Magazine. 
  7. ↑ “Improving the quality of Wikipedia articles using Cochrane evidence”. 《Cochrane》 (영어). 2019년 11월 19일에 확인함. 
  8. ↑ 가 나 Huijing Deng, Bernadetta Tarigan, Mihai Grigore, Juliana Sutanto, "Understanding the ‘Quality Motion’ of Wikipedia Articles Through Semantic Convergence Analysis", HCI in Business: Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Vol. 9191 (July 21, 2015), p. 64-75.
  9. ↑ Robert E. Kraut, Paul Resnick, Sara Kiesler, Building Successful Online Communities (2012), p. 38, "WikiProjects are groups of editors who work together on articles within a domain, like military history, sports, or medicine".
  10. ↑ Robert E. Kraut, Paul Resnick, Sara Kiesler, Building Successful Online Communities (2012), p. 85, "WikiProjects are groups of editors who work together on articles within a domain, like military history, sports, or medicine".
  11. ↑ Burke, Moira; Kraut, Robert (2008). 〈Taking up the mop〉. 《Proceedings of the Twenty-sixth Annual CHI Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems - CHI '08》. 3441쪽. doi:10.1145/1358628.1358871. ISBN 978-1-60558-012-8. S2CID 5868576. 
  12. ↑ Butler, Brian; Joyce, Elisabeth; Pike, Jacqueline (2008). 〈Don't look now, but we've created a bureaucracy〉. 《Proceedings of the Twenty-sixth Annual CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - CHI '08》. 1101쪽. doi:10.1145/1357054.1357227. ISBN 9781605580111. S2CID 15211227. 
  13. ↑ Kittur, Aniket; Suh, Bongwon; Pendleton, Bryan A.; and Chi, Ed H. (2007). 〈He says, she says: conflict and coordination in Wikipedia〉. 《Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing》. Association for Computing Machinery. 453–462쪽. doi:10.1145/1240624.1240698. ISBN 978-1-59593-593-9. S2CID 17493296. 
  14. ↑ Viegas, Fernanda B.; Wattenberg, Martin; Kriss, Jesse; van Ham, Frank (2007). “Talk Before You Type: Coordination in Wikipedia”. 《40th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences》: 575–582. CiteSeerX 10.1.1.210.1057. doi:10.1109/HICSS.2007.511. ISBN 978-0-7695-2755-0. S2CID 5293547. 
  15. ↑ 《Wikipedia:Wikiprojects》 
  16. ↑ Wikipedia:Database reports/WikiProjects by changes
  17. ↑ 《Wikipedia:Version 1.0 Editorial Team/Assessment》 
  18. ↑ “Comparing featured article groups and revision patterns correlations in Wikipedia”. First Monday. 2010년 7월 13일에 확인함. 
  19. ↑ Fernanda B. Viégas; Martin Wattenberg; Matthew M. McKeon (2007년 7월 22일). “The Hidden Order of Wikipedia” (PDF). Visual Communication Lab, IBM Research. 2007년 10월 30일에 확인함. 
  20. ↑ Poderi, Giacomo, Wikipedia and the Featured Articles: How a Technological System Can Produce Best Quality Articles, Master thesis, University of Maastricht, October 2008.
  21. ↑ Lindsey, David (2010년 4월 5일). “Evaluating quality control of Wikipedia's featured articles”. 《First Monday》 15 (4). 2017년 1월 29일에 확인함. 

틀:Wikipedia

원본 주소 "https://ko.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=사용자:Turror/연습장2&oldid=28162159"