The Treasury and the Trump administration listen to me now and want a quick answer.
I am an extremely ordinary man in his 50s who lives in South Korea.I am writing here because I want to know whether the Treasury Department's action is right.
On January 2, the bank divided 86,500 euros into two accounts and received letters and vouchers from the OPT Bank that the transfer was completed.But the Treasury suspended my account for how I knew it and then received a message from a Treasury employee that if you remitted $7,000 to him, he would bring my money directly to Korea and deliver it to me.So the question here is, how did the Treasury know my account and block my transaction, and the second is that I'll deliver it directly to me in cash, not in the bank account, but that's what's possible in the U.S., and the third is that they say I broke the law, and then they get permission to transfer.
What I really don't understand...
First, I don't understand how I knew about my bank transaction and stopped my account as soon as the bank completed the transfer.Isn't this evidence that the Treasury was monitoring individuals' financial transactions?
The second is that if a Treasury employee sends him $7,000 instead of a bank transaction, he will solve everything and come to Korea and deliver the money himself. Is this possible?
Finally, does it make sense that individuals should be given the government’s hunger to conduct financial transactions in a country like the United States, a sample of liberalism and capitalism? 2001:2D8:E999:1F33:0:0:2204:90AD (토론) 2020년 1월 16일 (목) 17:00 (KST)답변
