원시불교: 두 판 사이의 차이

원시불교를 가리키는 용어로는 "부파 이전 불교(pre-sectarian Buddhism)"<ref>{{서적 인용|인용문=... stressed that the written canon in Buddhism is sectarian from the outset, and that presectarian Buddhism must be deduced from the writings as they now exist|제목=Scripture of the Lotus Blossom of the Fine Dharma |저자=Leon Kurvitz |연도=1976 |출판사=Columbia University Press |기타=(quote via Google Scholar search-engine)}}</ref>, "가장 초기의 불교(the earliest Buddhism)",<ref>"The Earliest Buddhism", 《How Buddhism Began》, Richard F. Gombrich, Munshiram Manoharlal, 1997, p. 11 -12</ref><ref>{{저널 인용|인용문=It would be hypocritical to assert that nothing can be said about the doctrine of earliest Buddhism ... the basic ideas of Buddhism found in the canonical writings could very well have been proclaimed by him [the Buddha], transmitted and developed by his disciples and, finally, codified in fixed formulas. |저자=J.W. De Jong |발행년도연도=1993 |제목=The Beginnings of Buddhism|저널=The Eastern Buddhist|권=26|호=2|쪽=25}}</ref>, "근본 불교(original Buddhism)"<ref>"a reconstruction of the original Buddhism presupposed by the traditions of the different schools known to us." AK Warder, 《Indian Buddhism》, 1999, 3rd edition.</ref>, "붓다의 불교(the Buddhism of the Buddha himself )"<ref>{{서적 인용|인용문=This kernel of doctrine is presumably common Buddhism of the period before the schisms of the fourth and third centuries BC. It may be substantially the Buddhism of the Buddha himself.|저자=A. K. Warder|제목=Indian Buddhism|연도=1999|판=3rd edition.}}</ref> 등이 있다. 나카무라<ref>《Indian Buddhism》, Japan, 1980, reprinted Motilal, Delhi, 1987, 1989, table of contents</ref> 와 히라카와<ref name="Indian Buddhism 1974">《History of Indian Buddhism》, volume 1, Shinjūsha, Tokyo, 1974, English translation Hawai'i University Press, Honolulu, 1990,</ref> 와 같은 일본 학자들은 원시불교 시대를 가리키는 용어로 "초기 불교(Early Buddhism)"라는 용어를 사용하고 있으며, 그 이후의 부파적 전개를 "[[부파 불교]](sectarian Buddhism)"라고 부르고 있다.<ref name="Indian Buddhism 1974"/>