위키백과:FAQ/저작권: 두 판 사이의 차이

내용 삭제됨 내용 추가됨
แก้ไข
태그: m 모바일 웹
แก้ไข.
태그: m 모바일 웹
3번째 줄:
แก้ไข.
 
แก้ไข.
== 저작권이 무엇인가요? ==
:'''저작권'''은 다른 사람들을 그것을 카피하는 것을 예방하기 위해 granted하고 있는 창조적인 일의 프로듀서 권리이다. patent와 달리, 그러나 , 대부분의 장소들(i.e., countries) 에서 너는 저작권을 위해 적용하지 않아도 된다 – 너는 너가 창조적인 일을 제작하는 매 시간마다 그것을 자동적으로 얻을 수 있다.
 
:A creative work can be almost anything – a book, a song, a picture, a photograph, a poem, a phrase, or a fictional character. In the US, buildings built on or after December 1, 1990 are also eligible for copyright.<ref>[http://www.copyright.gov/circs/circ41.html Copyright Claims in Architectural Works]</ref>
 
:라이선스 may be granted to others, giving them the right to copy the work subject to certain conditions. A license is similar to a contract – the work may only be copied under the conditions given by the copyright holder or if one of the other exceptions to the copy right applies.
 
:Copyright laws vary between countries; the relevant US law is Title 17.<ref>[//www4.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/ Title 17]</ref> The [[Berne Convention for the Protection of Literary and Artistic Works|Berne convention]] is a comprehensive international agreement on copyrights which is part of the copyright law of many nations.<ref>[http://www.copyrightaid.co.uk/copyright_information/berne_convention_signatories berne convention signatories]</ref>
 
:Copyright does '''not''' protect against all possible copying: both US law and the Berne Convention limit copyright scope and enable much copying without permission even if the copyright holder objects. For example, piano roll (mechanical) rights for music within the US are available under a [[compulsory license]] with licensing rates that are set by the US Copyright Office.<ref name="compulsory_mech_license_mcdonald">{{cite web |url=http://musicians.about.com/od/publishingandroyalties/g/Compulsory-Mechanical-License.htm |title=What is a Compulsory Mechanical License |author=McDonald, Heather |publisher=[[About.com]] |accessdate=2015-01-04}}</ref> (To be covered by this compulsory license, the music in question must have been previously released to the public in the form of a recording at least once.)<ref name="compulsory_mech_license_mcdonald"/> In the US, ''fair use'' (in the UK, ''fair dealing'') is explicitly permitted as well, as is the right to sell a licensed copy of a copyrighted work, such as a video tape or sound recording. Also, both the Berne Convention and US law require that a work have some original creativity to be eligible for a copyright monopoly. [[Feist Publications v. Rural Telephone Service]] contains some examples of US decisions about what is and isn't original, including examples such as typo correction.
 
:''"Copyright is a temporary monopoly granted by the government – it creates the legal fiction that a piece of writing or composing ... is property and can only be sold by those who have been licensed to do so by the copyright holder".'' – [[Orson Scott Card]].<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.ornery.org/essays/warwatch/2003-09-07-1.html |author=Orson Scott Card |author-link=Orson Scott Card |publisher=The Ornery American |date=September 7, 2003 |accessdate=February 26, 2011 |title=MP3s Are Not the Devil }}</ref> Note that it is limited to the form of expression, not to the ideas. Thus, a book by Agatha Christie is likely to be copyrighted, but the mere idea of a detective with an accent and odd personal mannerisms would not be, nor would a story about someone claiming to be the premier consulting detective in a major city be a violation of the Conan Doyle copyrights on Sherlock Holmes stories. Ideas and facts are not copyrightable in most places, only the form of expression of them.
 
== 퍼블릭 도메인 ==