민주당 (미국): 두 판 사이의 차이

내용 삭제됨 내용 추가됨
6 개의 출처 구조, 0 개의 링크를 깨진 것으로 표시) #IABot (v2.0
편집 요약 없음
태그: m 모바일 웹
37번째 줄:
| 당원 = 44,706,349명<ref>{{웹 인용 |url=http://truthinmedia.com/libertarian-party-registrations-rising/ |제목=보관 된 사본 |확인날짜=2016-05-05 |보존url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160503120750/http://truthinmedia.com/libertarian-party-registrations-rising/ |보존날짜=2016-05-03 |깨진링크=예 }}</ref>
| 당원_연도 = 2017년
| 이념 = '''주류''':<br />[[미국의 현대 자유주의|현대 자유주의현대자유주의]]<ref name="sarnold">{{서적 인용|last=Arnold|first=N. Scott|title=Imposing values: an essay on liberalism and regulation|publisher=Oxford University Press|year=2009|location=Florence |isbn=0-495-50112-3|page=3|quote=Modern liberalism occupies the left-of-center in the traditional political spectrum and is represented by the Democratic Party in the United States.}}</ref><ref>{{뉴스 인용|url=http://www.huffingtonpost.com/benjamin-knoll/obama-romney-economy_b_1615862.html|title=President Obama, the Democratic Party, and Socialism: A Political Science Perspective|work=The Huffington Post|accessdate=January 9, 2015|date=June 29, 2012}}</ref><br/>[[사회자유주의]]<ref>{{웹 인용|author=Paul Starr|url=https://www.princeton.edu/~starr/articles/articles12/Starr_Center-left-liberalism.html|title=Center-Left Liberalism|publisher=Princeton University|accessdate=June 9, 2014|보존url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150303205946/http://www.princeton.edu/~starr/articles/articles12/Starr_Center-left-liberalism.html|보존날짜=2015-03-03|깨진링크=예}}</ref><br>[[민주사회주의]]<ref>{{뉴스 인용|last=Delk|first=Josh|title=Clinton: Being a capitalist 'probably' hurt me with Dem voters|url=http://thehill.com/blogs/blog-briefing-room/385942-clinton-being-a-capitalist-probably-hurt-her-2016-election-prospects|newspaper=[[The Hill (newspaper)|The Hill]]|date=May 2, 2018|accessdate=May 4, 2018|보존url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180626210812/http://thehill.com/blogs/blog-briefing-room/385942-clinton-being-a-capitalist-probably-hurt-her-2016-election-prospects|보존날짜=2018-06-26|깨진링크=예}}</ref><ref>{{뉴스 인용|last=Debebedetti|first=Gabriel|title=Poll: Majority of Democrats say socialism has 'positive impact'|url=https://www.politico.com/story/2016/02/democrats-poll-socialism-219600|newspaper=[[Politico]]|date=February 22, 2016|accessdate=May 4, 2018}}</ref><ref>{{인용|title=Democrats more divided on socialism|url=https://today.yougov.com/topics/politics/articles-reports/2016/01/28/democrats-remain-divided-socialism|website=[[YouGov]]|date=January 28, 2016|accessdate=May 4, 2018}}</ref><ref>{{뉴스 인용|last=Marcin|first=Tim|title=Democrats Want a Socialist to Lead Their Party More Than a Capitalist|url=http://www.newsweek.com/democrats-want-socialist-lead-their-party-more-capitalist-629659|magazine=[[Newsweek]]|date=June 28, 2017|accessdate=May 4, 2018|보존url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180622115449/http://www.newsweek.com/democrats-want-socialist-lead-their-party-more-capitalist-629659|보존날짜=2018-06-22|깨진링크=예}}</ref><br />'''비주류''':<br />[[중도주의]]<ref name="jhale">{{서적 인용|last=Hale|first=John|title=The Making of the New Democrats|publisher=Political Science Quarterly|year=1995|location=New York|page=229|quote=Second, insofar as Democrats in Congress are roughly split into liberal and centrist wings.}}</ref><ref name="DewanKornblut2006">{{뉴스 인용|last1=Dewan|first1=Shaila|last2=Kornblut|first2=Anne E.|title=In Key House Races, Democrats Run to the Right|url=https://www.nytimes.com/2006/10/30/us/politics/30dems.html|newspaper=The New York Times|accessdate=January 28, 2017|date=October 30, 2006}}</ref><br />[[자유보수주의보수주의]]<ref name="DewanKornblut2006"/><br />[[좌익대중주의]]<ref>[https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/more-liberal-populist-movement-emerging-in-democratic-party-ahead-of-2016-elections/2013/11/30/6729a850-53a7-11e3-9e2c-e1d01116fd98_story.html?utm_term=.49754cc0ec27 "More liberal, populist movement emerging in Democratic Party ahead of 2016 elections"], By Zachary A. Goldfarb. The Washington Post. November 30, 2013. Retrieved March 25, 2017.</ref><ref>[https://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2015/01/the-lefts-unpopular-populism-elizabeth-warren-democratic-party/384310/ "The Left's Unpopular Populism"], By Amitai Etzioni. The Atlantic. January 8, 2015. Retrieved March 25, 2017.</ref><ref>[https://www.thenation.com/article/america-in-populist-times-an-interview-with-chantal-mouffe/ "America in Populist Times: An Interview With Chantal Mouffe"], By Waleed Shahid. The Nation. December 15, 2016. Retrieved March 25, 2017.</ref><br />[[진보주의]]<ref>{{웹 인용|last1=Ball|first1=Molly|title=The Battle Within the Democratic Party|url=https://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2013/12/the-battle-within-the-democratic-party/282235/|website=The Atlantic|accessdate=January 28, 2017|보존url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180612142340/https://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2013/12/the-battle-within-the-democratic-party/282235/|보존날짜=2018-06-12|깨진링크=예}}</ref><br />[[사회민주주의]]<ref>{{인용|title=Social Democratic System|first=Syed Ali|last=Raza|publisher=Global Peace Trust|page=91|year=2012}}</ref><br/>[[민주사회주의]]<ref>{{뉴스 인용|last=Delk|first=Josh|title=Clinton: Being a capitalist 'probably' hurt me with Dem voters|url=http://thehill.com/blogs/blog-briefing-room/385942-clinton-being-a-capitalist-probably-hurt-her-2016-election-prospects|newspaper=[[The Hill (newspaper)|The Hill]]|date=May 2, 2018|accessdate=May 4, 2018|보존url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180626210812/http://thehill.com/blogs/blog-briefing-room/385942-clinton-being-a-capitalist-probably-hurt-her-2016-election-prospects|보존날짜=2018-06-26|깨진링크=예}}</ref><ref>{{뉴스 인용|last=Debebedetti|first=Gabriel|title=Poll: Majority of Democrats say socialism has 'positive impact'|url=https://www.politico.com/story/2016/02/democrats-poll-socialism-219600|newspaper=[[Politico]]|date=February 22, 2016|accessdate=May 4, 2018}}</ref><ref>{{인용|title=Democrats more divided on socialism|url=https://today.yougov.com/topics/politics/articles-reports/2016/01/28/democrats-remain-divided-socialism|website=[[YouGov]]|date=January 28, 2016|accessdate=May 4, 2018}}</ref><ref>{{뉴스 인용|last=Marcin|first=Tim|title=Democrats Want a Socialist to Lead Their Party More Than a Capitalist|url=http://www.newsweek.com/democrats-want-socialist-lead-their-party-more-capitalist-629659|magazine=[[Newsweek]]|date=June 28, 2017|accessdate=May 4, 2018|보존url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180622115449/http://www.newsweek.com/democrats-want-socialist-lead-their-party-more-capitalist-629659|보존날짜=2018-06-22|깨진링크=예}}</ref>
| 스펙트럼 = [[중도좌파]]<ref>https://www.nytimes.com/2019/03/05/opinion/democrats-liberals-socialists-cultural-left.html</ref><ref>https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/2019/03/05/democrats-are-still-center-left-theyll-stay-there-if-they-want-win/?noredirect=on&utm_term=.b035bfae91f8</ref><ref>{{웹 인용 |url=https://www.vice.com/en_us/article/xwbdd7/the-democratic-party-isnt-as-left-wing-as-you-think |제목=보관 된 사본 |확인날짜=2019-06-13 |보존url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190608185947/https://www.vice.com/en_us/article/xwbdd7/the-democratic-party-isnt-as-left-wing-as-you-think |보존날짜=2019-06-08 |깨진링크=예 }}</ref> ~ [[좌익]]<ref>{{웹 인용 |url=https://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2019/03/01/democrats_are_getting_out_on_a_dangerously_left-wing_limb__139616.html |제목=보관 된 사본 |확인날짜=2019-06-13 |보존url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190302180103/https://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2019/03/01/democrats_are_getting_out_on_a_dangerously_left-wing_limb__139616.html |보존날짜=2019-03-02 |깨진링크=예 }}</ref><ref>https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2019/feb/17/democrats-2020-elections-ocasio-cortez-sanders-centrists</ref><br />([[중도우파]]에서 [[극좌]]까지의 분파 존재)<br>'''역사적'''<br />[[우익]]~[[극우]] (1828~1865)<br />[[우익]] (1865~1933)
| 국제 = [[진보동맹]]<ref>http://progressive-alliance.info/2810-2/</ref>
| 상징색 = [[파란색]]