알프레트 아들러: 두 판 사이의 차이
내용 삭제됨 내용 추가됨
오타 고침 태그: m 모바일 앱 iOS 앱 편집 |
오타 고침 태그: m 모바일 앱 iOS 앱 편집 |
||
15번째 줄:
While the dominant note in Freudian psychology is a centrifugal tendency, a striving for pleasure in the object, in Adler’s it is a centripetal striving for the supremacy of the subject, who wants to be “on top,” to safeguard his power, to defend himself against the overwhelming forces of existence. The expedient to which the type described by Freud resorts is the infantile transference of subjective fantasies into the object, as a compensatory reaction to the difficulties of life. The characteristic recourse of the type described by Adler is, on the contrary, “security,” “masculine protest,” and the stubborn reinforcement of the “guiding fiction.” The difficult task of creating a psychology which will be equally fair to both types must be reserved for the future.(THE COLLECTED WORKS
OF VOLUME 6 -Psychological Types-APPENDIX: FOUR PAPERS ON PSYCHOLOGICAL TYPOLOGY 1-A CONTRIBUTION TO THE STUDY OF PSYCHOLOGICAL TYPES , C. G. JUNG)
:프로이드 심리학에서 주요한 언급은 원심적 경향, 즉 대상으로 향하는 쾌락을 위한 노력인 반면, 아들러에 있어서 그것은 "상위에 있고", 그의 힘을 보호하며, 압도적인 존재의 힘에 대항하여 자신을 방어하기 위해 애쓰는 구심성의 노력이다. 프로이트가 묘사하는 유형이 의존하는 방편은 삶의 고달픔에 대한 보상적 반응으로서 주관적 환상의 유아적 전이를 대상으로 하는 것이다. 아들러가 묘사하는 유형의 특징적인 의존성은 반대로 '안정', '남성형 시위', '가이드 픽션'의 완강한 강화다. 두 유형 모두 똑같이 공평하게
한편 [[칼 융]]은 이러한 맥락에서 아들러가 심리적 분석에서 독특하게 사용한 '배열'(arrangement)이라는 전문용어를 주요하게 언급하곤 하였다.<ref>(Collected Papers on Analytical Psychology - CHAPTER XIV THE PSYCHOLOGY OF THE UNCONSCIOUS PROCESSES -III.—The other Viewpoint: the Will to Power)The girl discovered this incomparable "arrangement" (to use Adler's term), applying it on occasion when the father was there with success. It became unnecessary when the father died, for now she was finally uppermost. The Italian was soon dismissed, because he laid too much stress upon her femininity by an inopportune reminder of his manliness. When the way opened to the possibility of a suitable marriage, she loved, adapting herself without any complaint to the deplorable rôle of the queen bee. As long as she held the position of admired superiority, everything went splendidly. But when her husband evinced a small outside interest, she was obliged again to have recourse to the extremely efficacious "arrangement," that is, to the indirect application of power, because she had once again come upon that thing—this time in her husband—that had already previously withdrawn her father from her influence.(https://ko.wikisource.org/wiki/%EB%B6%84%EC%84%9D%EC%8B%AC%EB%A6%AC%ED%95%99_%EB%85%BC%EB%AC%B8%EC%A7%91/Chapter14)</ref>
| |||