인간의 조건: 두 판 사이의 차이

내용 삭제됨 내용 추가됨
리듬 (토론 | 기여)
리듬 (토론 | 기여)
편집 요약 없음
17번째 줄:
# 우리는 가장 친절할 수도, 가장 고귀한 존재도 될 수도 있지만, 또한 우리는 가장 잔혹하고 가장 위협적인 존재도 될 수 있다.
# 인류는 영원한 삶을 꿈꾸지만, 항상 서로를 파괴할 새로운 방법을 고안하고 있다.
 
== 용어의 부정적 사용 ==
This term is sometimes used with a cynical or derogatory air, to imply that the human condition is in general a wretched one or that it cannot be improved. The term is often also used in a cynical way to describe the themes of pieces of art when nothing else is apparent. This can be associated with the ubiquitous phrase "only human," as far as pertains to its implications of inferiority to an unspecified comparative source. This can also be compared to the phrase "mere mortals" in a more declamatory or melodramatic mode of speech. Negative views of the "human condition" also may arise out of cynicism towards human [[civilization]].
The far-reaching implications of that philosophical inclination, however, are beyond the scope of this article. See: [[Nihilism]], [[Absurdism]], [[Misanthropy]], [[Anomie]], [[Cynicism]] etc. <!--For further information see Please insert appropriate article here !-->
 
== 변화의 가능성 ==
Certain movements, most prominently [[transhumanism]], aim to radically change the human condition. Some thinkers, like [[Enrico Fermi]] and others, deny that human nature has really changed in any fundamentally meaningful way over time and that, despite all of our social and scientific advances, human beings remain essentially unchanged and merely have been transplanted into progressively more complex environments. Transhumanist theorists agree; however, they argue that this is precisely the problem. In transhumanist thought, the human species clearly has come as far as it can usefully go in terms of [[Evolution|biological evolution]], and if we, as intelligent life forms, intend to keep [[Meliorism|progressing]] at what we consider to be a reasonable pace, we must dramatically alter the [[parameter]]s of life, via [[emerging technologies]]. Opponents of transhumanism such as extreme [[Neo-luddism|neo-luddites]], and moderate [[Techno-progressivism#Contrasting stance|bioconservatives]] assert that human nature, as we currently know it, is [[Apologism|sufficient]] for all intents and purposes, and therefore does not necessitate any [[Human enhancement|upgrade]]s.
 
Many transhumanists hold a positive and embracing view of life itself, but see the existence of the human mind and its human body as a something of a cosmic tragedy, because every human being is consigned to death after a relatively short and delimited life, even while humans have the intellectual capacity to imagine a better world that is presently beyond their experience. The human condition, to the transhumanist, is an oppressive circumstance to be rationally overcome through the judicious application of science and technology.
 
== 주석 ==
{{주석}}
<references/>
 
== 함께 읽기 ==
줄 49 ⟶ 40:
* [[제레미 그리피스]]
* [[자아 인식]]
 
<!--
 
[[분류:윤리문제]]
[[분류:생활]]
 
-->
[[ca:Condició humana]]
[[de:Conditio humana]]