파일 설명

라이선스

이 저작물은 1929년~1963년에 미국에서 발표되었으며, 저작권 갱신(renewal)이 이루어지지 않은 퍼블릭 도메인입니다. 미국 저작물에 대한 저작권 상호주의가 적용되지 않는 국가의 경우, 무조건적인 퍼블릭 도메인이 적용되지 않으며, 해당 국가 내에서는 여전히 저작권이 존재할 수 있습니다. 예를 들어, 캐나다(사후 70년), 중국 대륙(사후 50년, 홍콩/마카오 제외), 독일(사후 70년), 멕시코(사후 100년), 스위스(사후 70년) 등은 저작권 상호주의를 적용하지 않습니다. 저작권 기한에 대한 자세한 사항은 Commons:Hirtle chart 를 참조하세요. العربية ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ українська ∙ 简体中文 ∙ 繁體中文 ∙ +/−

Additional source information: This is a publicity photo taken to promote a film actor. As stated by film production expert Eve Light Honthaner in The Complete Film Production Handbook, (Focal Press, 2001 p. 211.):

"Publicity photos have traditionally not been copyrighted. Since they are disseminated to the public, they are generally considered public domain, and therefore clearance by the studio that produced them is not necessary."

Nancy Wolff, includes a similar explanation:

"There is a vast body of photographs, including but not limited to publicity stills, that have no notice as to who may have created them." (The Professional Photographer's Legal Handbook By Nancy E. Wolff, Allworth Communications, 2007, p. 55.)

Film industry author Gerald Mast, in Film Study and the Copyright Law (1989) p. 87, writes:

"According to the old copyright act, such production stills were not automatically copyrighted as part of the film and required separate copyrights as photographic stills. The new copyright act similarly excludes the production still from automatic copyright but gives the film's copyright owner a five-year period in which to copyright the stills. Most studios have never bothered to copyright these stills because they were happy to see them pass into the public domain, to be used by as many people in as many publications as possible."

Kristin Thompson, committee chairperson of the Society for Cinema and Media Studies writes in the conclusion of a 1993 conference with cinema scholars and editors, that they "expressed the opinion that it is not necessary for authors to request permission to reproduce frame enlargements. . . [and] some trade presses that publish educational and scholarly film books also take the position that permission is not necessary for reproducing frame enlargements and publicity photographs."[1]

기존 올리기 기록