위키백과:문서 등재 기준 (영화): 두 판 사이의 차이

내용 삭제됨 내용 추가됨
편집 요약 없음
편집 요약 없음
2번째 줄:
{{제안|백:영화|백:NF}}
{{문서 등재 기준 지침 둘러보기}}
The영화 notability관련 guideline문서의 for주목할만한 film-related지침은 articles영화 is관련 a주제가 standard자체 for문서가 deciding있는지 if결정하는 a film-related topic can have its own article기준입니다. For the majority of topics related to film, the criteria established at the [[WP:GNG|general notability guideline]] is sufficient to follow. This guideline, specific to the subject of film, explains the general notability guideline as it applies to film and also takes into consideration other core Wikipedia policies and guidelines as they apply to determining stand-alone articles or stand-alone lists for film.
 
== 일반 원칙 ==
==General principles==
 
:''Main article: [[WP:GNG|Wikipedia:General notability guideline]]''
10번째 줄:
The general notability guideline states, "If a topic has received significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject, it is presumed to satisfy the inclusion criteria for a stand-alone article or stand-alone list." The link to the main article explains each criterion. For topics related to film, some may not readily meet all the criteria. Other topics may be presumed to satisfy all the criteria but still may not qualify as a stand-alone article based on [[Wikipedia:Consensus|consensus]]. Additional criteria to evaluate these topics are outlined in the sections below.
 
== 신뢰할수 있는 출처 ==
==Reliable sources==
{{본문|위키백과:신뢰할 수 있는 출처}}
{{shortcut|WP:NFSOURCES}}
20번째 줄:
To presume notability, reliable sources should have significant coverage. Examples of coverage insufficient to fully establish notability include newspaper listings of screening times and venues, "[[capsule review]]s", plot summaries without critical commentary, or listings in comprehensive film guides such as ''[[Leonard Maltin's Movie Guide]]'', ''[[Time Out Film Guide]]'', or the [[Internet Movie Database]].<ref>Many of these sources can provide valuable information, and point to other sources, but in themselves do not indicate a notable subject. Similar cases of publications where mention does not establish notability may include: reviews that are part of a comprehensive review of ALL films in a particular festival, that don't assert anything regarding the notability of individual entries; other forms of comprehensive, non-selective coverage; and some web based reviews by amateur critics who have not established their own notability as critics.</ref>
 
== 다른 주목할만한 증거 ==
==Other evidence of notability==
 
A topic related to film may not meet the criteria of the general notability guideline, but significant coverage is not always possible to find on the Internet, especially for older films. The following are attributes that generally indicate, when supported with [[WP:SOURCES|reliable sources]], that the required sources are likely to exist: