위키백과:문서 등재 기준 (영화): 두 판 사이의 차이

== 일반 원칙 ==

{{본문|위키백과:문서 등재 기준}}

 

== 신뢰할수 있는 출처 ==

문서 등재 기준 중 하나는 적용 범위가 독립 피사체에서 신뢰할수 있는 출처에서 비롯되어야한다는 것입니다. 이 문단에서는 출처의 독립성과 신뢰성에 대해 설명합니다.

 

 

저명성을 추정하기 위해, 신뢰할수 있는 출처에는 상당한 범위가 있어야합니다. Examples of coverage insufficient to fully establish notability include newspaper listings of screening times and venues, "[[capsule review]]s", plot summaries without critical commentary, or listings in comprehensive film guides such as ''[[Leonard Maltin's Movie Guide]]'', ''[[Time Out Film Guide]]'', or the [[Internet Movie Database]].<ref>Many of these sources can provide valuable information, and point to other sources, but in themselves do not indicate a notable subject. Similar cases of publications where mention does not establish notability may include: reviews that are part of a comprehensive review of ALL films in a particular festival, that don't assert anything regarding the notability of individual entries; other forms of comprehensive, non-selective coverage; and some web based reviews by amateur critics who have not established their own notability as critics.</ref>

 

# 이 영화는 널리 배포되었으며 2곳 이상의 지역에서 전국적으로 알려진 비평가의 전체 길이 평가를 받았습니다.

#*Publication of at least two non-trivial articles, at least five years after the film's initial release.

#*The film was deemed notable by a broad survey of film critics, academics, or movie professionals, when such a poll was conducted at least five years after the film's release.<ref>Examples would include the [http://www.bfi.org.uk/sightandsound/topten/ Sight and Sound Poll], [[AFI's 100 Years…100 Movies]], [http://www.filmsite.org/timeout.html Time Out Centenary of Cinema], [http://www.combustiblecelluloid.com/Lists/villvoice.shtml 1999 Village Voice Critics Poll], Positif's poll, etc.</ref>

 

== 개봉을 앞둔 영화, 제작중인 영화 및 배포중인 영화 ==

Films that have not been confirmed by [[WP:RS|reliable sources]] to have commenced [[principal photography]] should '''not''' have their own articles, as budget issues, scripting issues and casting issues can interfere with a project well ahead of its intended filming date. The assumption should also not be made that because a film is likely to be a high-profile release it will be immune to setbacks—there is no "sure thing" production. Until the start of principal photography, information on the film might be included in articles about its subject material, if available. Sources must be used to confirm the start of principal photography '''after''' shooting has begun.

 

Additionally, films that have already begun shooting, but have not yet been publicly released (theatres or video), should generally not have their own articles unless [[MOS:FILM#Production|the production itself]] is notable per the [[WP:N|notability guidelines]]. Similarly, films produced in the past which were either not completed or not distributed should not have their own articles, unless their failure was notable per the guidelines.

 

 

When seeking out references to establish the notability of a film, and to provide the necessary information for a thorough article of high quality, consider some of these resources:

 

#A film's entry in the [http://www.imdb.com The Internet Movie Database], or similar databases, can provide valuable information including links to reviews, articles, and media references. A page in the database does not by itself establish the film's notability, however.

 

==같이 보기==

{{각주}}

 

 

[[분류:위키백과 문서 등재 기준|영화]]