위키백과:편집 정책: 두 판 사이의 차이

내용 삭제됨 내용 추가됨
편집 요약 없음
38번째 줄:
 
=== 삭제가 적합한 문제점 ===
우리의 핵심 정책 중 일부는 정보를 보존하지 않고 문서에서 제거하는 것이 더 적절한 상황일 수 있음을 언급하고 있습니다. [[위키백과:확인 가능]]은 출처가 밝혀지지 않은 논쟁적인 내용 처리에 대해 이야기합니다. [[위키백과:독자 연구 금지]]는 독자 연구를 제거해야 함을 밝히고 있습니다. [[위키백과:위키백과에 대한 오해|위키백과에 대한 오해]]는 위키백과에 기본적으로 적합하지 않은 내용을 묘사하고 있습니다. [[위키백과:비중]]은 특정 관점에 무게를 두는 것을 막기 위해 트리비아, 작고 사소한 관점, 고품질 출처로 보완될 수 없는 내용 등을 삭제하는 균형잡힌 내용 서술 방법을 소개하고 있습니다. 또한 문서 내 내용 중복은 최소로 유지해야합니다 ([[위키백과:편집 지침/도입부|도입부]]를 제외하고 전체 문서를 요약한 것도 의도적인 중복임).
Several of our core policies discuss situations when it ''might'' be more appropriate to remove information from an article rather than preserve it. [[Wikipedia:Verifiability]] discusses handling unsourced and contentious material; [[Wikipedia:No original research]] discusses the need to remove original research; [[WP:NOT|What Wikipedia is not]] describes material that is fundamentally inappropriate for Wikipedia; and [[WP:UNDUE]] discusses how to balance material that gives undue weight to a particular viewpoint, which might include removal of trivia, tiny minority viewpoints, or material that cannot be supported with high-quality sources. Also, redundancy within an article should be kept to a minimum (excepting the [[WP:LEAD|lead]], which is meant to be a summary of the entire article, and so is intentionally duplicative).
 
Libel, nonsense, and vandalism should be completely removed, as should material that [[Wikipedia:Copyright violations|violates copyright]] and material for which no reliable source that supports it has ever been [[Wikipedia:Published|published]].
 
Special care needs to be taken with biographies of living people, especially when it comes to handling unsourced or poorly sourced claims about the subject. Editors working on such articles need to know and understand the extra restrictions that are laid out at [[Wikipedia:Biographies of living people]].
 
==토론과 편집==
''[[Wikipedia:Be bold in updating pages|Be bold in updating articles]], especially for minor changes and fixing problems''. Previous authors do not need to be consulted before making changes. [[WP:OWN|Nobody owns articles]]. If you see a problem that you can fix, do so. Discussion is called for, however, if you think the edit might be controversial or if someone indicates disagreement with your edit (either by reverting your edit and/or raising an issue on the talk page). The [[Wikipedia:BOLD, revert, discuss cycle|"BOLD, revert, discuss cycle" (BRD)]] is often used when changes might be contentious.
 
Boldness should not mean trying to impose edits against [[WP:CONSENSUS|existing consensus]] or in violation of core policies, such as [[Wikipedia:Neutral point of view|Neutral point of view]] and [[Wikipedia:Verifiability|Verifiability]]. [[Wikipedia:Fait accompli|''Fait accompli'']] actions, where actions are justified by their having already been carried out, are inappropriate.
 
===협조하기: 변경점을 설명하세요===
''Be helpful: explain your changes''. When you edit an article, the more radical or controversial the change, the greater the need to explain it. Be sure to leave a comment about ''why'' you made the change. Try to use an appropriate [[Help:Edit summary|edit summary]]. For larger or more significant changes, the edit summary may not give you enough space to fully explain the edit; in this case, you may leave a note on the [[Wikipedia:Talk page|article's talk page]] as well. Remember too that notes on the talk page are more visible, make misunderstandings less likely and encourage discussion rather than [[WP:EW|edit warring]].
 
===핵심 사항의 변경에 주의하기: 토론하세요===
''Be cautious about making a major change to an article.'' Prevent [[WP:EW|edit warring]] by discussing such edits first on the article's talk page. One editor's idea of an improvement may be another editor's idea of a desecration. If you choose to be [[WP:BOLD|bold]], try to justify your change in detail on the article talk page, so as to avoid an edit war. Before making a major change, consider first creating a new draft on a [[Wikipedia:User_pages#SUB|subpage of your own user page]] and then link to it on the article's talk page so as to facilitate a new discussion.
 
=== 하지만 위키백과는 토론장이 아닙니다 ===
{{Further|위키백과:위키백과에 대한 오해#위키백과는 개인의 의견이나 생각을 발표하는 곳이 아닙니다.}}
Whether you decide to edit very boldly or discuss carefully on the talk page first, please bear in mind that Wikipedia is not a discussion forum. It is best to concentrate our energies on improving articles rather than debating our personal ideas and beliefs. This is discussed further at [[Wikipedia:Etiquette]].
 
== 더 보기 ==