사용자:Gaepakchinae/연습장/블랙 스완 (서적)

블랙 스완
The Black Swan: The Impact of the Highly Improbable
파일:The black swan taleb cover.jpg
하드백 초판
나라미국
언어영어
장르논픽션
주제과학철학, 무작위성, 인식론
출판사랜덤하우스 (미국), 앨런 레인(en:Allen Lane) (영국)
발행일2007년 4월 17일 (원서)
ISBN978-1400063512
OCLC번호71833470
시리즈인세르토
이전 작품행운에 속지 마라
다음 작품프로크루스테스의 침대

The Black Swan: The Impact of the Highly Improbable is a 2007 book by author and former options trader Nassim Nicholas Taleb. The book focuses on the extreme impact of rare and unpredictable outlier events — and the human tendency to find simplistic explanations for these events, retrospectively. Taleb calls this the Black Swan theory.

The book covers subjects relating to knowledge, aesthetics, as well as ways of life, and uses elements of fiction and anecdotes from the author's life to elaborate his theories. The book spent 36 weeks on the New York Times best-seller list.[1]

The book is part of Taleb's five volume series, titled the Incerto[2] including Fooled by Randomness (2001), The Black Swan (2007–2010), The Bed of Procrustes (2010–2016), Antifragile (2012), and Skin in the Game (2018).

Coping with Black Swan events 블랙 스완 사건과 함께하기 편집

A central idea in Taleb's book is not to attempt to predict Black Swan events, but to build robustness to negative events and an ability to exploit positive events. Taleb contends that banks and trading firms are vulnerable to hazardous Black Swan events and are exposed to losses beyond those predicted by their defective financial models.

The book asserts that a "Black Swan" event depends on the observer, e.g., what may be a Black Swan surprise for a turkey is not a Black Swan surprise for its butcher. Hence the objective should be to "avoid being the turkey", by identifying areas of vulnerability in order to "turn the Black Swans white".

요약 편집

저자는 본서가 단 하나의 발상에 대한 수필이나 이야기라고 말했다: "무작위성, 특히 편차가 큰 무작위성에 대한 우리들의 맹목성"[3]

The book moves from literary subjects in the beginning to scientific and mathematical subjects in the later portions. Part One and the beginning of Part Two delve into psychology. Taleb addresses science and business in the latter half of Part Two and Part Three. Part Four contains advice on how to approach the world in the face of uncertainty and still enjoy life.

Taleb acknowledges a contradiction in the book. He uses an exact metaphor, the Black Swan idea to argue against the "unknown, the abstract, and imprecise uncertain—white ravens, pink elephants, or evaporating denizens of a remote planet orbiting Tau Ceti."

There is a contradiction; this book is a story, and I prefer to use stories and vignettes to illustrate our gullibility about stories and our preference for the dangerous compression of narratives.... You need a story to displace a story. Metaphors and stories are far more potent (alas) than ideas; they are also easier to remember and more fun to read.[4]

파트 1: 움베르토 에코의 반도서관, 혹은 우리가 어떻게 입증을 추구하는가 Umberto Eco's anti-library, or how we seek validation 편집

첫 번째 챕터에서, 블랙 스완 이론은 저자의 에 엮어 처음으로 논해진다.In the first chapter, the Black Swan theory is first discussed in relation to Taleb's coming of age in the Levant. 저자는 그러고는 그의 접근 방식을 역사적인 분석으로 설명한다. 그는 역사를 불투명한, 본질적으로 원인과 효과를 알 수 없는 검은 상자로 묘사한다.The author then elucidates his approach to historical analysis. He describes history as opaque, essentially a black box of cause and effect. One sees events go in and events go out, but one has no way of determining which produced what effect. Taleb argues this is due to The Triplet of Opacity.[5]

The second chapter discusses a neuroscientist named Yevgenia Nikolayevna Krasnova and her book A Story of Recursion. She published her book on the web and was discovered by a small publishing company; they published her unedited work and the book became an international bestseller. The small publishing firm became a big corporation, and Yevgenia became famous. This incident is described as a Black Swan event.

The book goes on to admit that the so-called author is a work of fiction. Yevgenia rejects the distinction between fiction and nonfiction. She also hates the very idea of forcing things into well defined "categories", holding that the world generally is complex and not easy to define. Though female, the character is based, in part, autobiographically on the author (according to Taleb), who has many of the same traits.

The third chapter introduces the concepts of Extremistan and Mediocristan. He uses them as guides to define how predictable the environment one's studying is. Mediocristan environments safely can use Gaussian distribution. In Extremistan environments, a Gaussian distribution should be used at one's own peril.

Chapter four brings together the topics discussed earlier, into a narrative about a turkey. Taleb uses it to illustrate the philosophical problem of induction and how past performance is no indicator of future performance. He then takes the reader into the history of skepticism.

In chapter nine, Taleb outlines the multiple topics he previously has described and connects them as a single basic idea.

In chapter thirteen, the book discusses what can be done regarding epistemic arrogance. He recommends avoiding unnecessary dependence on large-scale harmful predictions, while being less cautious with smaller matters, such as going to a picnic. He makes a distinction between the American cultural perception of failure versus European and Asian stigma and embarrassment regarding failure: the latter is more tolerable for people taking small risks. He also describes the "barbell strategy" for investment he used as a trader, which consists in avoiding medium risk investments and putting 85–90% of money in the safest instruments available and the remaining 10–15% on extremely speculative bets.

논점 편집

The term black swan was a Latin expression: its oldest reference is in the poet Juvenal's expression that "a good person is as rare as a black swan" ("rara avis in terris nigroque simillima cygno", 6.165).[6] It was a common expression in 16th century London, as a statement that describes impossibility, deriving from the old world presumption that 'all swans must be white', because all historical records of swans reported that they had white feathers.[7] Thus, the black swan is an oft cited reference in philosophical discussions of the improbable. Aristotle's "Prior Analytics" is the most likely original reference that makes use of example syllogisms involving the predicates "white", "black", and "swan." More specifically, Aristotle uses the white swan as an example of necessary relations and the black swan as improbable. This example may be used to demonstrate either deductive or inductive reasoning; however, neither form of reasoning is infallible, since in inductive reasoning, the premises of an argument may support a conclusion, but do not ensure it, and similarly, in deductive reasoning, an argument is dependent on the truth of its premises. That is, a false premise may lead to a false result and inconclusive premises also will yield an inconclusive conclusion. The limits of the argument behind "all swans are white" is exposed—it merely is based on the limits of experience (e.g., that every swan one has seen, heard, or read about is white). The point of this metaphor is that all known swans were white until the discovery of black swans in Australia. Hume's attack against induction and causation is based primarily on the limits of everyday experience and so too, the limitations of scientific knowledge.

반응 편집

수학 교수 David Aldous는 "Taleb is sensible (going on prescient) in his discussion of financial markets and in some of his general philosophical thought, but tends toward irrelevance or ridiculous exaggeration otherwise."[8]라고 논했다. Gregg Easterbrook wrote a critical review of The Black Swan in the New York Times[9] to which Taleb replied with a list of logical errors, blaming Easterbrook for not having read the book.[10] Giles Foden, writing for The Guardian in 2007, described the book as insightful, but facetiously written, saying that Nassim's "dumbed-down" style was a central problem, especially in comparison to Taleb's Fooled by Randomness.[11]

노벨상을 수상한 심리학자 대니얼 카너먼은 "The Black Swan changed my view of how the world works"을 썼으며, 2011년에 출간한 그의 서적 Thinking, Fast and Slow 에서 그 영향을 설명한다.

2007년에 초판이 출간된 이래로, 2011년 2월까지 거의 3백만 부가 팔렸다. 뉴욕 타임스 베스트셀러 목록에 36주 동안 머물러있었는데,[12] 17주는 하드커버, 19주는 페이퍼백 판본이 머물러있었다.[13] 32개 언어로 출간되었다.[14]

참고문서 편집

각주 편집

  1. “Taleb Outsells Greenspan as Black Swan Gives Worst Turbulence”. 《Bloomberg》. 2008년 3월 27일. 
  2. Taleb, Nassim Nicholas (2016년 11월 15일). “Incerto: Fooled by Randomness The Black Swan The Bed of Procrustes Antifragile”. Random House Trade Paperbacks. 2017년 11월 5일에 확인함 – Amazon 경유. 
  3. Taleb 2007 p.xix.
  4. Taleb 2007 PROLOGUE p.xxvii, Taleb call this human tendency the narrative fallacy: we seem to enjoy stories, and we seem to want to remember stories for their own sake.
  5. Taleb 2007 PROLOGUE p8.
  6. Puhvel, J. (1984). “The Origin of Etruscan tusna ("Swan")”. 《The American Journal of Philology》 105 (2): 209. doi:10.2307/294875. JSTOR 294875. 
  7. Taleb, Nassim Nicholas. “Opacity: What We Do Not See”. Fooledbyrandomness.com. 2010년 10월 1일에 확인함. 
  8. David Aldous, A critical review of Taleb, Nassim Nicholas. The Black Swan: The Impact of the Highly Improbable, A.M.S. Notices, March 2011, pp. 427–413
  9. Easterbrook, Gregg (2007년 4월 22일). “Possibly Maybe”. 《The New York Times》. 
  10. Nassim Nicholas Taleb. “Abbreviated List of Factual and Logical Mistakes in Gregg Easterbrook’s Review of The Black Swan in The New York Times (PDF). 《Fooledbyrandomness.com》. 2017년 11월 5일에 확인함. 
  11. Foden, Giles (2007년 5월 12일). “Stuck in Mediocristan”. 《The Guardian. 2015년 1월 7일에 확인함. 
  12. “Charlie Rose Talks to Nassim Taleb”. 《Bloomberg.com》. 2011년 2월 24일. 2017년 11월 5일에 확인함. 
  13. Schuessler, Jennifer. “Hardcover”. 《The New York Times》. 
  14. Taleb, Nassim Nicholas (2010년 5월 11일). “The Black Swan: Second Edition: The Impact of the Highly Improbable: With a new section: "On Robustness and Fragility". Random House Trade Paperbacks. 2017년 11월 5일에 확인함 – Amazon 경유. 
  15. The Black Swan was dedicated to Mandelbrot.
  16. Taleb, Nassim Nicholas (2010년 11월 1일). “Benoît Mandelbrot”. 《Time. 2017년 11월 5일에 확인함. 

주석 편집

외부 링크 편집